A goal you can check (SMART) · From Zero to Goals, lesson 4 of 17
A goal you can check (SMART)
Turn a wish into a sentence an outsider could verify, and run your own goal through the checker.
A goal you can check
You can now diagnose a broken goal, and above your goals stands a ladder: a mission that filters, a destination with a date, a chosen road. Time to build what lives on the bottom floor: a goal that would pass your own diagnosis, a sentence an outsider could verify without asking anyone how it went.
The recipe has a name (SMART), but forget the acronym for a moment. In practice one skeleton does the work: from X to Y, by when, owned by one person. This lesson is about getting that skeleton right on the first goal Brightside actually needs.
Three rewrites on the table
Priya proposes an area goal for Brightside’s own marketing: “Do better marketing for ourselves.” Dana asks her to make it checkable. Ten minutes later, three candidate rewrites are on the table:
1 · “Publish 2 case studies every month.”
2 · “Increase inbound leads.”
3 · “Grow qualified inbound leads from 4 to 10 per month by end of Q2 · owner: Priya. Qualified = books a call and fits the mission.”
Which rewrite survives checking?
The baseline argument
Rewrite 3 wins, and immediately starts a fight. Sam: “Why baseline 4? March alone had 6.” The numbers on the table:
· January: 3 qualified leads. · February: 3. · March: 6, the month Brightside spoke at a conference.
Trailing three-month average: 4. The sentence needs ONE number after “from”, and which one goes in changes what the quarter means.
Which baseline goes in the sentence?
From X to Y, by when, owned by one name
That skeleton carries all five SMART criteria a small team really needs: the baseline makes it honest, the number makes it checkable, the date makes it reviewable, the single owner makes it real. And the ladder you built in lessons 1.2–1.3 (mission, vision, road) already answered “relevant”.
One more rule from Brightside’s rewrite: define the words that can rot. “Qualified”, “active”, “churned”: every metric with an undefined noun in it drifts toward whatever makes the quarter look good.
Rewrite the goal you wrote down in lesson one
Take the goal you wrote down, warts and all, in lesson 1.1, and rebuild it on the skeleton: from X to Y, by when, one owner. If a word in your metric can rot (“active”, “qualified”, “done”), define it in the same breath.
Saved in this browser only. Keep it on a free account and it stops depending on this one.
Write your sentence above first: there is nothing to check yet.
3 of these 5 are read from your sentence. The other 2 are yours to answer, because no checker can know them.
- ○ From X to Y: a starting point and a targetread from your text
A target without a baseline hides whether the goal is brave or already done. Write both numbers: “from 8 to 12”, or “4 → 10”.
- ○ By when: a date, a month or a quarterread from your text
Without a date there is no moment where the goal is answered, so it drifts to the end of the quarter and then to the next one.
- ✓ Every word in the metric that can rot is definedread from your text
Not a team, not two people who will coordinate. One name, and it can be yours. Two owners means the goal is nobody's on the week it gets hard.
Read your sentence to someone who does not know the work. If they cannot say “hit” or “missed” from the sentence alone, it still needs one number or one definition.
Fix the sentence above and this updates as you type. Your best run is the one that counts, so nothing you do here can cost you what you already have.
More on writing checkable goals
All optional, and none of it is needed for the certificate. Each opens in a new tab, so your place in the lesson is kept.
- How to write SMART goals ↗The five criteria one at a time, with the wording that survives being read back to you.5 min read
- SMART goals: the complete guide ↗The long version: where SMART came from, what it is good at, and the point where it stops helping.10 min read
- A SMART goals template you can copy ↗A blank to fill in, if you would rather start from a form than from a rule.7 min read